Co-auteur
  • RAMEL Frédéric (6)
  • REICH Simon (5)
  • CHARILLON Frédéric (4)
  • DOMBROWSKI Peter (4)
  • Voir plus
Type de Document
  • Livre (8)
  • Partie ou chapitre de livre (6)
  • Article (4)
  • Contribution à un site web (3)
  • Voir plus
in Manuel de diplomatie Sous la direction de BALZACQ Thierry, RAMEL Frédéric, BALZACQ Thierry, CHARILLON Frédéric, RAMEL Frédéric Publié en 2018-08-16
CHARILLON Frédéric
125
vues

0
téléchargements
Le phénomène diplomatique dans l'histoire Réflexions théoriques sur la diplomatie Retour sur le concept de « diplomatie » À propos de ce manuel

in Comparative Grand Strategy: A Framework and Cases Sous la direction de BALZACQ Thierry, REICH Simon, BALZACQ Thierry, DOMBROWSKI Peter, REICH Simon Publié en 2019-08
DOMBROWSKI Peter
24
vues

0
téléchargements
This chapter lays out the objectives of the volume, provides a new conceptual and methodological framework, and justifies case selection. It comprises three sections. The first section argues that a comparative approach to the study of grand strategy both highlights the constraints of contemporary single-country research and the opportunities presented by a systematic research design. The chapter’s second section evaluates the alternative definitions and competing theoretical traditions developed to study grand strategy. The authors argue in favor of an integration of these traditions within a single framework, coupled with an expanded universe of countries as viable cases. In the third section, the authors examine which systemic and domestic factors organically influence the ways in which states formulate and implement grand strategies. The chapter identifies criteria for better explanations about why individual states make specific choices, and provides threads that ensure the internal consistency of the book.

in Comparative Grand Strategy: A Framework and Cases Sous la direction de BALZACQ Thierry, BALZACQ Thierry, DOMBROWSKI Peter, REICH Simon Publié en 2019-08
9
vues

0
téléchargements
France conducted a unique grand strategy, labeled “grandeur,” from the late 1950s to 1989. Its key elements were: the search for global status; the need for independence in decision-making and a related refusal to accept subordination to the United States; and the primacy of nuclear power in its military arsenal. But France has radically reoriented its grand strategy for the last three decades towards a more integrative formulation of “liberal engagement.” This chapter first describes the features of grandeur and then identifies the factors that led France to pursue liberal engagement. It describes and compares the characteristics of the two along three axes: their theoretical bases, causal logic, and policy components. The chapter concludes by examining the impact of liberal engagement on France’s forms of foreign engagement; assesses the ways and extent to which they serve France’s interests; and evaluates the consequences of those choices.

Contesting Security investigates to what extent the ‘logic of security’, which underpins securitization, can be contained, rolled back or dismantled. Featuring legitimacy as a cement of security practices, this volume presents a detailed account of the "logic" which sustains security in order to develop a novel approach to the relation between security and the policies in which it is engraved. Understanding security as a normative practice, the contributors suggest a nuanced, and richer take on the conditions under which it is possible, advisable or fair to accept or roll back its policies. The book comprises four sections, each investigating one specific modality of contesting security practices: resistance, desecuritization, emancipation, and resilience. These strategies are examined, compared and assessed in different political and cultural habitats. This book will be of much interest to students of critical security studies, securitisation theory, social theory, and IR in general.

This book provides an analysis of the European Neighbourhood Policy by focusing on the impact of norms of justice and home affairs on EU external relations. Drawing on the literature of 'new governance' it designs a framework for analysis which clarifies the contents, tools and processes of the external dimension of EU justice and home affairs.

in Site du CERI Publié en 2019-02-19
83
vues

0
téléchargements
Thierry Balzacq a rejoint le CERI en janvier 2019 comme professeur des universités. Ses travaux portent sur les relations internationales et la sécurité entre autre. Il nous parle de son parcours, de ses recherches et de ses projets. Entretien réalisé par Miriam Périer.

22
vues

0
téléchargements
What is grand strategy? Do states have the monopoly of grand strategy? Can all states develop and claim to have a grand strategy? What can a comparative study of grand strategy bring to an understanding of global politics? Thierry Balzacq , Simon Reich and Peter Dombrowski examine these questions and many more in a coedited volume promoting a novel approach to the concept of grand strategy, Comparing Grand Strategy: A Framework and Cases (Oxford University Press, 2019). Interview with Thierry Balzacq and Simon Reich. Interview by Miriam Perier, CERI

58
vues

0
téléchargements
This contribution to the symposium examines tensions holding back the development of securitization theory and proposed potential avenues to transcend and resolve them. Specifically, it argues that the evolution of securitization has been shaped by two main debates: one between those who hold that securitization is decided by the elite and those who hold that it is co-constructed by the elite and target audiences; and a second debate between scholars who treat securitization as de-politicization and researchers who argue that securitization cannot be severed from politics. While these debates have been acknowledged in the literature, they are seldom if ever addressed. This article examines the roots of these tensions, showing how they have undermined the coherence of the theory. It then introduces the concept of a regime of practices as a promising solution, arguing that it better accounts for how security issues emerge and acquire their legitimacy, which provides them with a social stickiness. Further, the article shows that both moments of creation and transformation of regimes of practices involve a specific kind of politics (the politics of the extraordinary), wherein ideas, principles, and aims of the community are said to be vitally at stake.

Sous la direction de BALZACQ Thierry, CHARILLON Frédéric, RAMEL Frédéric Publié en 2018-08-16
84
vues

0
téléchargements
La pratique diplomatique a connu plusieurs mutations majeures : elle n'est plus l'apanage de l’État et de ses agents, elle use d’instruments d’une technicité croissante, elle investit de nouveaux territoires de négociation. Ces changements ont suscité un regain d’intérêt pour l’analyse de la scène diplomatique par de nombreuses disciplines, de la science politique des relations internationales à l’histoire, en passant par la sociologie. Premier Manuel de diplomatie en langue française, cet ouvrage aborde toutes les dimensions de l’institution diplomatique au XXIe siècle, en la situant dans son évolution historique et en présentant ses aspects classiques comme ses nouvelles formes d’expression.

28
vues

0
téléchargements
Aujourd’hui encore, l’idée selon laquelle le système international présente une structure unipolaire au bénéfice des États-Unis d’Amérique est largement répandue. La plupart des arguments relèvent du politico-stratégique et soulignent la fonction sécuritaire exercée par la première puissance mondiale du point de vue des capacités militaires. D’autres variables sont également convoquées comme l’adhésion aux valeurs et aux normes portées par les États-Unis. Joseph Nye considère qu’au XXIe siècle la prééminence américaine – à défaut de son hégémonie qui n’est plus – repose sur un répertoire d’action qui conjugue coercition, rétribution et persuasion. [Premières lignes]

Suivant